Intellectually-conflicted reviews are an ethical and moral danger for the reviewers, result in repeated or permanent rejection of good papers, seriously hurt the careers of the authors, stymie progress in our field, but remain unrecognized by our review process.

Disclaimer: These posts are written by individual contributors to share their thoughts on the Computer Architecture Today blog for the benefit of the community. Any views or opinions represented in this blog are personal, belong solely to the blog author and do not represent those of ACM SIGARCH or its parent organization, ACM.

While the peer review process is the bedrock of modern science, it is notoriously slow, subjective, and inefficient. This blog post explores...

Editor's note: With continuing proliferation of LLMs and their capabilities, academic community started to discuss their potential role in...

The conference The 52nd ISCA, which was held in Tokyo from June 21 to 25, was just completed. One notable thing for  this year ISCA is the...

What Is Jevons Paradox? Jevons Paradox, first described by economist William Stanley Jevons in the 19th century, states that increasing the...