Ethical and Moral Fraying due to Intellectual Conflicts in Paper Reviews
Intellectually-conflicted reviews are an ethical and moral danger for the reviewers, result in repeated or permanent rejection of good papers, seriously hurt the careers of the authors, stymie progress in our field, but remain unrecognized by our review process.
The Reviewer is Dead, Long Live the Review: Re-engineering Peer Review for the Age of AI
While the peer review process is the bedrock of modern science, it is notoriously slow, subjective, and inefficient. This blog post explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to re-imagine the review architecture, augmenting human expertise to build a...Subscribe
