Archive of posts tagged: Reviewing
The Role of LLMs in Academic Reviewing
Editor’s note: With continuing proliferation of LLMs and their capabilities, academic community started to discuss their potential role in paper reviewing process. Some conferences are already piloting the assistance of LLMs in their reviewing this year. To...
Hacks To Be a Great Reviewer
I had an exhausting and painful experience this year with reviews for recent top-tier SIGARCH conferences – the usual ISCA, ASPLOS, HPCA, MICRO. No I am not complaining about the reviewer load. It’s reading others’ reviews of papers I was reviewing –...
Serving on Conference Program Committees
Good news: The computer architecture community is growing! Submissions to major conferences have increased substantially in recent years, including just under 500 submissions to MICRO 2024. This growth reflects the vibrancy in our field, continued expansion of what...
Confuseds, Strategists, and Snoozers: A Whimsical Odyssey Through the Maze of Paper Reviews
Navigating the labyrinthine corridors of academic publishing, authors often encounter three formidable guardians, each with their unique, sometimes perplexing, approach to gatekeeping. These are the Confused Reviewer, the Rational Reviewer, and the Lazy Reviewer....Subscribe
